Heat Pipe Thermal Conductivity: An Essential Guide

Efficient heat management is necessary for electronic device performance and life because high temperatures destroy components and cause thermal failure. Phase transition, where a liquid absorbs heat, evaporates, and condenses in a colder place, makes heat pipes a unique solution. The two-phase heat transfer technique is efficient in small, high-power-density devices. The heat pipe thermal conductivity may reach up to 100,000 W/m·K, above solid materials like copper or aluminum. It validates great thermal performance in complex electronic cooling systems.

Understanding Heat Pipe Thermal Conductivity

Concept of Heat Pipe Thermal Conductivity

Heat pipe thermal conductivity is a measure of how efficiently heat is transferred from one point to another within the heat pipe system. It is higher than the thermal conductivity of solid metals due to the phase-change mechanism of the working fluid inside the pipe. For example, copper has a thermal conductivity of 386 W/m·K. However, a heat pipe can attain thermal conductivities from 4,000 to 100,000 W/m·K. It comes from the near-frictionless movement of vaporized fluid within the pipe. Importantly, the value is not fixed but depends on the pipe's length, diameter, and the fluid used. Heat pipes with smaller diameters exhibit higher thermal conductivities. Meanwhile, the effective thermal conductivity decreases as the cross-sectional area increases.

Heat Transfer Mechanism in Heat Pipes

Heat pipes transfer heat through evaporation and condensation, unlike traditional solid conductors. When heat is applied to the evaporator section, the working fluid inside the pipe vaporizes. The vapor moves through the pipe toward the cooler condenser section. It is driven by the pressure difference between the two ends. The condensed liquid is returned to the evaporator through capillary action by a wick or porous material lining the inner walls of the pipe. The cycle repeats for an almost constant heat flow. Consequently, the resistance to heat flow is very low for the extreme thermal conductivity in heat pipes. For instance, a copper pipe using water as a fluid can outperform solid copper by at least a factor of 10 in the context of heat dissipation.

Phases of Heat Transfer

The heat transfer process in a heat pipe has evaporation, condensation, and capillary action. First, the working fluid at the evaporator absorbs heat and transitions from liquid to vapor, which decreases thermal resistance and increases heat transfer. The vapor travels to the cooler condenser section. Here, it releases latent heat and condenses back into a liquid state. Finally, capillary action drives the condensed liquid back to the evaporator to complete the cycle. The phase-change mechanism is what makes heat pipe thermal conductivity high. Maintaining this cycle under varying conditions depends on the fluid used. For example, water might be effective between 30°C and 200°C, and ammonia suits sub-zero applications. The efficiency of capillary action is important. It guarantees continuous operation under challenging thermal gradients.

Differences in Solid Metal vs Heat Pipe Thermal Conductivity

Thermal Conductivity Comparison

Let's compare heat pipe thermal conductivity to that of traditional solid metals. Pure copper for its thermal performance offers a conductivity of about 386 W/m°C. Aluminum is another material, which delivers 237 W/m·K. In contrast, the thermal conductivity of a heat pipe can reach up to 100,000 W/m·K under ideal conditions. It is due to the heat pipe's transferring heat through phase change mechanisms, which surpasses the fixed molecular heat conduction in metals. Essentially, copper or aluminum counts solely on the direct transfer of energy between adjacent atoms. Yet, a heat pipe uses fluid dynamics, giving it orders of magnitude higher conductivity. Subsequently, it renders heat pipes better for applications needing rapid, efficient heat dissipation, including but not limited to high-performance electronics or space systems.

Phase Change Mechanism and Enhanced Thermal Efficiency

The key to the heat pipe thermal conductivity is in its use of phase change. When heat is applied to the heat pipe, the working fluid evaporates and travels as vapor through the pipe. Unlike the slow, molecular transfer of heat in solid metals, vapor transport is efficient due to the low thermal resistance of the gas phase. For instance, a heat pipe many centimeters long can move heat across that distance with negligible loss. Nevertheless, solid metal would experience a temperature gradient. The vapor condenses at the cooler end of the pipe, releasing heat. The fluid returns to the heat source by capillary action or gravity. Apart from boosting heat transfer, such a cyclical process also improves thermal efficiency with consistent temperatures across long distances. It makes heat pipes more effective in challenging thermal management scenarios.

Differences in Thermal Conductivity by Heat Pipe Diameter

Impact of Diameter on Heat Pipe Thermal Conductivity

The relationship between diameter and heat pipe thermal conductivity must balance heat transfer capacity and effective thermal conductivity. Smaller diameter pipes show a higher effective thermal conductivity due to their lower cross-sectional area. It lowers the vapor path for less flow resistance and facilitates heat transport. Although larger diameter pipes can theoretically move more heat due to increased Qmax, they suffer from a lower effective thermal conductivity as cross-sectional area increases. E.g., a small 3 mm diameter heat pipe can show up to twice the effective thermal conductivity of an 8 mm diameter pipe under comparable conditions. Its vapor flow is more focused for better conduction and lower energy dissipation. It shows why diameter optimization is more important than heat transfer capacity for high thermal conductivity uses.

Diameter Choice Implications for Thermal Management Applications

Thermal management's heat pipe diameter affects heat dissipation efficiency and adaptation to orientations and settings. For compact laptops and smartphones, small-diameter heat pipes are ideal due to their higher effective thermal conductivity and conduction efficiency in tight spaces. Yet, for high-powered server cooling systems requiring heat removal, larger diameter pipes might be preferred for a higher Qmax to handle the heat output. Moving to vapor chambers, which may exhibit lower thermal conductivity than multiple heat pipes, can benefit high-heat flux applications, despite their limitations in thermal conductivity due to larger cross-sectional areas. Ultimately, the diameter and design structure (round vs. flat) should support the system's heat dissipation and space needs, impacting thermal management solutions' performance and life.

Calculating Effective Thermal Conductivity

Keff = Q Leff /(A ΔT)

Where:

• Keff = Effective thermal conductivity [W/m·K]

• Q = Power transported [W]

• Leff = Effective length = (Levaporator + Lcondenser)/2 + Ladiabatic  [m]

• A = Cross-sectional area [m^2]

• ΔT = Temperature difference between evaporator and condenser sections [°C]

To further explore thermal calculations, visit our heat sink calculator page.

Conclusion

Recently developed nanostructured wick materials and sintered copper powders may increase heat pipe thermal conductivity. Graphene's thermal conductivity exceeds 4,000 W/m·K, so covering heat pipes with it may increase heat transmission. PCMs are also being incorporated in heat pipes to increase peak load heat dissipation. Hybrid heat pipes that combine two-phase cooling with magnetocaloric or electrocaloric effects may improve thermal management in high-power-density electronics, including data centers and electric vehicle power electronics.

For customized thermal management solutions, please contact us.